Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Abbott defends abortion pill veto

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=60498

Health Minister Tony Abbott says a nasty element suggesting religious bias is creeping into the debate on controversial abortion-inducing pill RU486.
The Catholic minister has rejected claims his opposition to the drug is dictated solely by his religious beliefs.
--------------------------------

The abortion debate whether or not we should allow it to go on or not. I am going to finally publish my views on the issue. Mr. Abbott should not have a say in the issue about allowing the drug to be sold simply because he may have some biased to his religion. Politics and religion do not mix everyone knows that. When making a decsion as he will have to make someone must be unbiased and do it because it is the suitable thing to do for the people not because of personal perspective. I am one for abortion, before anyone gets huffy hear me out. How many thousands of children are homeless and abused everyday by parents who do not want them? You can only imagine the numbers. I know abortion means the termination of an innocent life but what kind of a life is one where you must go unloved and abused and left out in the streets to die? That is no life at all, it is a cruel and twisted way in which to torture someone. Many of these people and kids wish to be dead so why let them be born in the first place? I am not one of those extremist people I have morals to you know. But I am thinking about the greater good for these children and people who do not have success stories and do go through a living hell. Is it better that two people who have no money to provide for themselves bring a child into the world that they cannot care for? Should fifteen year olds bring a child into this world when they are still children themselves. I agree that people who have sex without protection with multiple partners are stupid however they know they risk they are running against themselves that is their own fault. What about victims of rape? What about people who did take the right precautions to avoid pregnancy, should they not be given a choice? Australia is a country of choice as opposed to many other countries around the world and I believe that it is up to the choice of the individual couple (or single) to decide what is right.

4 Comments:

At 8:15 pm, February 12, 2006, Blogger spicey pineapple said...

thanks, if ever i write a novel it'll be weird and reflecting

 
At 9:53 pm, February 12, 2006, Blogger Ciaran said...

when i ran away from home I lived on the streets
But Now I have a job
And some money to spare
But you are right about un protected sex
Did'nt the Pope say no sex before marrage
But is'nt it imbarising
To go into a Farmacy and say.....
I like a lifetime supply of Condoms

 
At 5:40 am, February 13, 2006, Blogger spicey pineapple said...

yeah the pope did say no sex before marriage but in this day and age people do not follow the old ways of life and do not save their virginity. i think people should have sex when they are redy but about the whole getting pregnant thing you have to be careful, getting pregnant is not easy but its not just that think about all the std'd and sti's that are going around these days i mean do you really want to be having unprotected sex?

 
At 6:10 pm, February 13, 2006, Blogger Ciaran said...

hey Belinda
There was a war on in 1944
called d-Day and it all happened
on the beaches in front of my house.....
Take a look
There is a really good picture of it

 

Post a Comment

<< Home